Throughout the years people all over the worlds have seen the rise and fall of leaders. Many men who promised to bring change, but failed, or to defend their countries, but didn’t live up to the standards of the world. And over the years the names of some of these leaders have made headlines or even in some textbooks, while others still leave this world to be forgotten.
And then there are those, who humbly come to serve. Those men and women who don’t want to make their lives about them, but instead about spreading the message of love and hope to the kings and queens and the poorest of the poor. These are the people that leave an impression in our hearts that will never leave; left to be remembered forever.
Today, the late Pope John Paul II, or shall I say Blessed Pope John Paul II was beatified in a beautiful mass in St. Peter’s Square in front of close to 2 million people.
As a Catholic myself, I can speak for Catholics all over the world when I say that although I never personally spoke to Blessed Pope John Paul, he was like a father figure to me. When he died in 2005, I felt like I lost a member of my family. He truly revolutionized the world, just not for Catholics, but for those who do not believe as well.
My heart is filled with joy to know that my beloved Pope John Paul is one step closer to being canonized as an “official” Saint. In fact for those who may not know, the process of beatification is supposed to start at least five years after the person being considered dies. But current pope, Pope Benedict XVI, did away with that rule after Blessed Pope John Paul died. In fact, his process for beatification began just weeks after his death. In order to begin this process, a certain number of miracles have to be proven. In this particular case, several were, including a Nun, Sister Samone- Pierre, who was miraculously cured of Parkinson’s disease. The same illness Blessed Pope John Paul suffered from.
The wonderful, heaven-sent miracles that are attributed to Blessed Pope John Paul’s intercession, only scratch the surface of how God has used this man to truly make a difference in this world for the better. Our world would truly not be the same, if it were not for this Godly man with a love for Jesus and Our Blessed Mother Mary.
Blessed Pope John Paul II exemplified the qualities of a true leader. He did what no president, dictator, king or queen could ever do. His sole mission was to love. And love can be a very powerful tool to spread peace, especially if its God’s love, through His holy word, that you are trying to spread.
As pope he visited 129 countries, to try and help those in need. He was the first practicing pope ever to visit Mexico, the White House, and the UK where he met with Queen Elizabeth II. He went to impoverished countries like India, Haiti, El Salvador and Uganda. He met the poorest of the poor with love and encouraged them to grow in their faith with God and pushed the wealthy to create a better quality of life for those less fortunate.
He brought the message of unity to everyone around the world. He urged Christians, Jews and Muslims to work together for peace. But he didn’t just talk the walk, he actually lived out his message. In 2000 he became the first Pope to visit Jerusalem’s Western Wall and referred to the Jewish people as the Christian people’s “Older brothers in faith.”
He was also credited by many for the falling of the Berlin Wall, urging leaders to break the oppression of those suffering under Communism.
Perhaps one of the greatest qualities of Blessed Pope John Paul II was his love for the youth. In a time when many young people were leaving the church and being “forgotten,” Blessed Pope John Paul II made it a point to encourage the youth to use their gifts and talents to spread Jesus Christ’s Good News to the world for the next generation, what he called the New Evangelization. He began what is called World Youth Day, which still goes on today. The first youth day took place in 1984. They happen all over the world every four years. The next one will be this upcoming August in Madrid, Spain. During this time millions of young Catholics from around the world gather to pray, sing and Praise the Lord Jesus Christ through Eucharistic adoration.
Not only did he display a love for the youth, but through his actions he preached forgiveness. In 1981 a Turkish man attempted to assassinate Blessed Pope John Paul II in St. Peters Square by shooting him three times. Blessed Pope John Paul nearly died, but by the grace of God and protection from above he survived. That same year he visited the man who tried to kill him, in his prison cell. When the man asked, “Why aren’t you dead?” Blessed Pope John Paul replied, “that His Blessed Mother Mary, Jesus Mother, protected him.” The assassination attempt had occurred on the Feast Day of Our Lady of Fatima (a day to honor the Mary, Jesus’ Mother). He knew She was there with him. The Turkish man told Blessed Pope John Paul II that he was afraid that Our Lady of Fatima would harm him for what he had tried to do to the Pope. But Blessed Pope John Paul II assured him to not be afraid, that the Blessed Mother loves everyone and would never hurt him. But what he did next would change the man’s life forever. Blessed Pope John Paul II told the man that he came to forgive him and then embraced him. Blessed Pope John Paul II held no anger towards the man who tried to kill him.
I don’t know of many so-called leaders that could hold this amount of love and forgiveness for someone who tried to hurt them.
Blessed Pope John Paul II exemplified the qualities, and was, a man of integrity, virtue, holiness, forgiveness, strength, courage and most of all, love. He led the Catholic Church with the firm understanding and love for Christ. And he led the world into a better understanding of what it means to be a true follower a Christ.
There will never be anyone like Blessed Pope John Paul II again, but he will continue to live on in our hearts. May we remember his love for all human life in every kind act we do and use him as an inspiration to grow closer to Christ and Our Blessed Mother Mary.
“Be not afraid!” Said Blessed Pope John Paul II. May we have the courage to live out love like this brave man of God did. And may future leaders religious or not, follow his example.
In the loving words of My Beloved Papa, “Totus Tuus Maria.”
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Friday, April 29, 2011
I'll take a healthier alternative please!
Soda and social networking don’t make a healthy combination.
Two days ago Pepsi Co. announced it’s version of the “Social Vending System,” in which people buy a soda from the vending machine and then “gift” a friend through typing in their name, cell number and personalized message into the machine. The text message will then be sent out to the intended recipient with a code and instructions to redeem a free soda at any other state of the art Pepsi Social Vending system.
It’s no secret that soda is not good for us and with the rising number of obesity in this country it’s no doubt that this new “state of the art” Pepsi machine is just continuing the cycle of obesity, which kills over 100,000 people a year. The Pepsi Co. needs to come up with a healthier alternative to bring in more profit. I know it sounds like an oxymoron- buy a soda and get something healthy, but hey, it’s a start.
It’s better for Pepsi to take the “healthy” route and try to incorporate some sort of healthy incentive to buy their products, rather than just start a cycle of buying soda after soda. This world already sees enough diabetes, cavities and other problems due to being overweight, the least this soda company can due is use this new vending machine to contribute to the improvement of our world, rather than help create more health problems through their products.
I’ve come up with some “healthier” alternatives that can still help Pepsi increase revenue, while still helping customers live better lives.
First, Pepsi can collaborate with some sort of fitness program, whether it be a gym, like Bally’s or 24 Hour Fitness or maybe DVD workouts like the creators of P90X. Instead of sending promotional codes to redeem a free soda, vending machine customers can send out two text messages, one to their phone and another to a friend. The code redeemed online can be used as a discount to some sort of workout class at a gym or a workout video. This way people can have a soda, but also have an option of working out and working off the calories afterwards. Who knows, maybe this will “open the door” for someone to start working out on a daily basis.
Another idea combines soda with philanthropic work. People always love an opportunity to give back to those less fortunate. In the wake of the devastation in Japan and the tragedy of the tornadoes in the southern United States, the Pepsi Co. can team up with a charity like the Red Cross. Instead of typing in someone’s phone number, the customer can choose from a selection of causes to donate to (i.e. Japan, Southern States, Haiti, etc…). Pepsi will then proceed to date a portion on the money made off the beverage to a charity helping out with various devastations around our world. This may seem like a far-fetched idea, but helping those in need is always a compelling reason for people to by a soda.
The word “Social” in “Social Vending,” doesn’t have to always mean commenting on someone’s wall or tagging them in a picture. To be social can be to reach out and communicate with those around you for a greater good. In this case Pepsi has the ability to allow people to “gift” people with the gift of a healthier lifestyle or help during natural disasters.
Even though their business is soda, one of the unhealthiest beverages one could consume, The Pepsi Co. needs to recognize that they shouldn’t use their products and the latest technology to play with a person’s health. It is pretty obvious that these “social vending” machines will start a vicious cycle of consumers increasing their intake of Pepsi.
On the PepsiCo. Web site, Chief Innovation Officer, Mikel Durham said, “Our vision is to use innovative technology to empower consumers and create new ways for them to engage with our brands.” But I highly doubt this is empowering customers, especially if they are putting them in a position in which they will heighten their chances of obesity, diabetes and dental problems.
In 2009 The UCLA Center for Health Policy Research did a study linking soda intake to the rise of obesity in California. They found the following:
• Adults who drink one or more sodas a day are 27 percent more likely to be overweight or obese.
• Each additional serving of soda a day increases a child’s risk of obesity by 60 percent.
• In the last 25 years, the obesity rate in California rose from 8.9 percent to 24 percent, which is about 1 in 4 Americans.
This really does put things into perspective. Christine Sister, VP, equipment innovation, PepsiCo. said on the web site, “Our approach to technology innovation is driven by what we know consumers want.” I understand what she’s saying, but ultimately I don’t think costumers want to become part of the chain of consumers that will contribute to the increase of obesity in this country.
The web site goes on to say, “Social vending also enables, ‘Random Acts of Refreshment’- the ability to buy a drink for a complete stranger through any other Social Vending system.” That’s great that Pepsi has good intentions in this area, but realistically they will be doing a better act if they promote less soda and more healthy habits, which can enable their loyal customers to live a longer life.
Two days ago Pepsi Co. announced it’s version of the “Social Vending System,” in which people buy a soda from the vending machine and then “gift” a friend through typing in their name, cell number and personalized message into the machine. The text message will then be sent out to the intended recipient with a code and instructions to redeem a free soda at any other state of the art Pepsi Social Vending system.
It’s no secret that soda is not good for us and with the rising number of obesity in this country it’s no doubt that this new “state of the art” Pepsi machine is just continuing the cycle of obesity, which kills over 100,000 people a year. The Pepsi Co. needs to come up with a healthier alternative to bring in more profit. I know it sounds like an oxymoron- buy a soda and get something healthy, but hey, it’s a start.
It’s better for Pepsi to take the “healthy” route and try to incorporate some sort of healthy incentive to buy their products, rather than just start a cycle of buying soda after soda. This world already sees enough diabetes, cavities and other problems due to being overweight, the least this soda company can due is use this new vending machine to contribute to the improvement of our world, rather than help create more health problems through their products.
I’ve come up with some “healthier” alternatives that can still help Pepsi increase revenue, while still helping customers live better lives.
First, Pepsi can collaborate with some sort of fitness program, whether it be a gym, like Bally’s or 24 Hour Fitness or maybe DVD workouts like the creators of P90X. Instead of sending promotional codes to redeem a free soda, vending machine customers can send out two text messages, one to their phone and another to a friend. The code redeemed online can be used as a discount to some sort of workout class at a gym or a workout video. This way people can have a soda, but also have an option of working out and working off the calories afterwards. Who knows, maybe this will “open the door” for someone to start working out on a daily basis.
Another idea combines soda with philanthropic work. People always love an opportunity to give back to those less fortunate. In the wake of the devastation in Japan and the tragedy of the tornadoes in the southern United States, the Pepsi Co. can team up with a charity like the Red Cross. Instead of typing in someone’s phone number, the customer can choose from a selection of causes to donate to (i.e. Japan, Southern States, Haiti, etc…). Pepsi will then proceed to date a portion on the money made off the beverage to a charity helping out with various devastations around our world. This may seem like a far-fetched idea, but helping those in need is always a compelling reason for people to by a soda.
The word “Social” in “Social Vending,” doesn’t have to always mean commenting on someone’s wall or tagging them in a picture. To be social can be to reach out and communicate with those around you for a greater good. In this case Pepsi has the ability to allow people to “gift” people with the gift of a healthier lifestyle or help during natural disasters.
Even though their business is soda, one of the unhealthiest beverages one could consume, The Pepsi Co. needs to recognize that they shouldn’t use their products and the latest technology to play with a person’s health. It is pretty obvious that these “social vending” machines will start a vicious cycle of consumers increasing their intake of Pepsi.
On the PepsiCo. Web site, Chief Innovation Officer, Mikel Durham said, “Our vision is to use innovative technology to empower consumers and create new ways for them to engage with our brands.” But I highly doubt this is empowering customers, especially if they are putting them in a position in which they will heighten their chances of obesity, diabetes and dental problems.
In 2009 The UCLA Center for Health Policy Research did a study linking soda intake to the rise of obesity in California. They found the following:
• Adults who drink one or more sodas a day are 27 percent more likely to be overweight or obese.
• Each additional serving of soda a day increases a child’s risk of obesity by 60 percent.
• In the last 25 years, the obesity rate in California rose from 8.9 percent to 24 percent, which is about 1 in 4 Americans.
This really does put things into perspective. Christine Sister, VP, equipment innovation, PepsiCo. said on the web site, “Our approach to technology innovation is driven by what we know consumers want.” I understand what she’s saying, but ultimately I don’t think costumers want to become part of the chain of consumers that will contribute to the increase of obesity in this country.
The web site goes on to say, “Social vending also enables, ‘Random Acts of Refreshment’- the ability to buy a drink for a complete stranger through any other Social Vending system.” That’s great that Pepsi has good intentions in this area, but realistically they will be doing a better act if they promote less soda and more healthy habits, which can enable their loyal customers to live a longer life.
A royal message
It is now hours before the much- anticipated “Royal Wedding” between Prince William and Catherine Middleton. No one has been able to turn on the television without seeing every news reporter talking about Kate’s dress. We’ve seen coins, mugs and candy sporting the faces of the bride and groom to be. The news media has done a great job talking about all the superficial aspects of Will and Kate’s marriage, but the problem is that they are missing the point of the role of this royal couple. More needs to be done to shed light on the philanthropic work the couple plans to do, rather than wedding guest list.
Princess Diana was definitely a woman that was loved by all and stood out for her works of love, through helping the poor, needy and lonely around the world. It’s no wonder why so many people are attempting to compare how Kate will live up to her late mother-in-law. So if the world is going to compare Kate to Princess Diana, wouldn’t it only be natural for them to ask of the future Princess what she plans to do for the less fortunate of the world? But no… instead they are prying Lady Middleton to please let them know who is designing her wedding dress.
The truth is, Kate is her own person and deserves to be given room to carve her own path and make her own footsteps. So far we know that the couple asks that instead of wedding gifts, that their guests give money to a charity the couple have selected.
Journalists covering the wedding, need to ask questions that matter. Kate’s engagement ring and hats are nice, but they can only do so much for society. To be royal not only means to look good, but to do good as well. And this is something that people need to remember. When the guests have gone home and the honeymoon is over, how will William and Kate make their mark as husband and wife?
No doubt this wedding is monumental for a reason, but the underlying reason is because they have a big duty to accomplish. Too much is given much is expected. They have a duty to the people of their country, to reach out, just as Princess Diana did. To hold the hand of the sick person in the hospital, to inspire the young children in the school yard and let the lonely elderly person know that they are still valuable and wanted. The opportunity to make a difference in the lives of others is what makes being of a royal family so valuable.
I think news networks need to take a brake from talking about the latest dress Kate has worn and dedicate a segment to “The Future Works of the Royal Couple.” The segment could highlight several key issues of the bride and groom.
1) First it will highlight their philanthropic efforts thus far.
2) The reporter will touch upon the fact that William has decided that Kate will not be taking on full-time royal duties immediately after they are married, in order for her to become comfortable in her duty as a member of the royal family. Will these mean Kate will be involved in less charity work for the beginning days of their marriage?
3) The last part of the segment would highlight the couple’s future charity work. This would include discussing key issues that Will and Kate will focus on as a couple.
Hopefully people around the world won’t get lost in the hype of the glitz and glamour of these two lives coming together. Through the right kind of media attention, the public can begin to know what makes a royal marriage important- the ability to make a difference in live of those who need help, not those who need fashion tips.
Princess Diana was definitely a woman that was loved by all and stood out for her works of love, through helping the poor, needy and lonely around the world. It’s no wonder why so many people are attempting to compare how Kate will live up to her late mother-in-law. So if the world is going to compare Kate to Princess Diana, wouldn’t it only be natural for them to ask of the future Princess what she plans to do for the less fortunate of the world? But no… instead they are prying Lady Middleton to please let them know who is designing her wedding dress.
The truth is, Kate is her own person and deserves to be given room to carve her own path and make her own footsteps. So far we know that the couple asks that instead of wedding gifts, that their guests give money to a charity the couple have selected.
Journalists covering the wedding, need to ask questions that matter. Kate’s engagement ring and hats are nice, but they can only do so much for society. To be royal not only means to look good, but to do good as well. And this is something that people need to remember. When the guests have gone home and the honeymoon is over, how will William and Kate make their mark as husband and wife?
No doubt this wedding is monumental for a reason, but the underlying reason is because they have a big duty to accomplish. Too much is given much is expected. They have a duty to the people of their country, to reach out, just as Princess Diana did. To hold the hand of the sick person in the hospital, to inspire the young children in the school yard and let the lonely elderly person know that they are still valuable and wanted. The opportunity to make a difference in the lives of others is what makes being of a royal family so valuable.
I think news networks need to take a brake from talking about the latest dress Kate has worn and dedicate a segment to “The Future Works of the Royal Couple.” The segment could highlight several key issues of the bride and groom.
1) First it will highlight their philanthropic efforts thus far.
2) The reporter will touch upon the fact that William has decided that Kate will not be taking on full-time royal duties immediately after they are married, in order for her to become comfortable in her duty as a member of the royal family. Will these mean Kate will be involved in less charity work for the beginning days of their marriage?
3) The last part of the segment would highlight the couple’s future charity work. This would include discussing key issues that Will and Kate will focus on as a couple.
Hopefully people around the world won’t get lost in the hype of the glitz and glamour of these two lives coming together. Through the right kind of media attention, the public can begin to know what makes a royal marriage important- the ability to make a difference in live of those who need help, not those who need fashion tips.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
A lesson for television news
Here’s the $15 million question: in the rough state of our economy, why are news networks paying their anchors an insane amount of money, despite declining ratings? Some people on television make too much money, for doing too little. Networks must rethink their strategies if they want their programs to survive an era when television news is struggling… to say the least.
Katie Couric and Diane Sawyer (just to name a few) all make a whopping $15 million a year, while Matt Lauer makes $13 million. When Katie Couric became anchor of CBS evening news, CBS employers all over the world felt it. Many were laid off just to compensate for Couric’s salary.
The indifference these on air “talents” have towards the repercussions of their high salaries is part of the key issue here. The other part is that these networks are still willing to negotiate extremely high salaries with these anchors, despite their dropped ratings.
Yes, these people you see reporting on network news are hardworking and talented, but to be quite frank, reading off a teleprompter,and 25 second copy stories about political reports and maybe an "exclusive interview" here and there is hardly worth earning more than $10 million dollars.
As a broadcast journalism major myself I know the inside world of broadcast news, and I will be the first to admit that the salaries these people on network news make is ridiculous. I propose a change be made in the world of news.
Here’s the $10 solution:
First of all the presidents of these networks need to come to terms that the quality of their news programs are declining, because of their limited staff. Many talented on air reporters, producers, writers, and camera crews were laid off after the networks couldn’t afford to pay them, because they decided an anchor was way more important. Many were left without work and the networks were stuck with limitations on their resources.
The solution to this is simple. (Drum roll please…) Pay your anchors less. If they don’t like it, then let them leave. I know for a fact there are tons of people who would gladly take Couric or Sawyer’s job for less money, without complaint. Many of these people are not essential to the news anyways. If they leave because they won’t get paid as much it’s ok. After all, they never did increase ratings from the beginning. Networks have nothing to lose.
Many people within the network news companies may argue that it’s not so simple to fix this dilemma, but they are getting it all wrong. Their theory is, pay a well-known person more to grab more viewers. The sad reality is that this strategy is not working. It may even be a plus if these on- air people leave. Networks need to diversify to grab a larger audience. Most anchors are Caucasians in their fifties to sixties. I highly doubt this will grab the attention of college students or minorities, especially those who don’t have a keen interest in the news. Networks need young minorities reporting the news. They are more relatable, specifically to the minority population of our nation.
Instead of spending their company’s money on high salaries, networks need to use the money on training younger reporters and correspondents around the world. It’s all about investing in the young talent today, so that news networks can have seasoned, diverse reporters for the future; Not just one anchor the network is banking on to draw in viewers.No pun intended. It may also inspire the next generation of broadcast journalists to be less greedy. After all, making the most money shouldn’t be what journalism is all about.
Katie Couric and Diane Sawyer (just to name a few) all make a whopping $15 million a year, while Matt Lauer makes $13 million. When Katie Couric became anchor of CBS evening news, CBS employers all over the world felt it. Many were laid off just to compensate for Couric’s salary.
The indifference these on air “talents” have towards the repercussions of their high salaries is part of the key issue here. The other part is that these networks are still willing to negotiate extremely high salaries with these anchors, despite their dropped ratings.
Yes, these people you see reporting on network news are hardworking and talented, but to be quite frank, reading off a teleprompter,and 25 second copy stories about political reports and maybe an "exclusive interview" here and there is hardly worth earning more than $10 million dollars.
As a broadcast journalism major myself I know the inside world of broadcast news, and I will be the first to admit that the salaries these people on network news make is ridiculous. I propose a change be made in the world of news.
Here’s the $10 solution:
First of all the presidents of these networks need to come to terms that the quality of their news programs are declining, because of their limited staff. Many talented on air reporters, producers, writers, and camera crews were laid off after the networks couldn’t afford to pay them, because they decided an anchor was way more important. Many were left without work and the networks were stuck with limitations on their resources.
The solution to this is simple. (Drum roll please…) Pay your anchors less. If they don’t like it, then let them leave. I know for a fact there are tons of people who would gladly take Couric or Sawyer’s job for less money, without complaint. Many of these people are not essential to the news anyways. If they leave because they won’t get paid as much it’s ok. After all, they never did increase ratings from the beginning. Networks have nothing to lose.
Many people within the network news companies may argue that it’s not so simple to fix this dilemma, but they are getting it all wrong. Their theory is, pay a well-known person more to grab more viewers. The sad reality is that this strategy is not working. It may even be a plus if these on- air people leave. Networks need to diversify to grab a larger audience. Most anchors are Caucasians in their fifties to sixties. I highly doubt this will grab the attention of college students or minorities, especially those who don’t have a keen interest in the news. Networks need young minorities reporting the news. They are more relatable, specifically to the minority population of our nation.
Instead of spending their company’s money on high salaries, networks need to use the money on training younger reporters and correspondents around the world. It’s all about investing in the young talent today, so that news networks can have seasoned, diverse reporters for the future; Not just one anchor the network is banking on to draw in viewers.No pun intended. It may also inspire the next generation of broadcast journalists to be less greedy. After all, making the most money shouldn’t be what journalism is all about.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
PUBLIC SQUARE Giving a Voice to the Silenced: The Missing Women of Juarez
Everyday dozens of girls go missing in the Mexican city of Juarez, Chihuahua. They seem to just disappear with out a trace in site. No notes, no leads. Just mothers’ tears and fathers’ questions of what happened to their child.
Hundred of “Missing Women” flyers line the walls of Juarez buildings. They show the pictures and description of girls, ages fifteen to their early twenties.; Attempts of families trying to find answers.
One cannot help but wonder, where is the government in this mess? The corruption of the countries police force is quite evident, but still no justified excuse as to why so many innocent lives with so much potential are taken away, especially with no closure given to their families.
According to a report done by reporter Girish Gupta of New Statesman, since current Mexican president, Felipe Calderon took office in 2006 the number of women vanishing or being killed has risen. If the country’s president cannot come to the assistance of these young women, then surely this gives a reflection of the political state of the country.
Now, before I elaborate on this issue I would like to add a note about Mexico. It truly is a wonderful country with beautiful people, nature and culture. And this piece is in no way trying to tarnish the reputation of this country with rich history. I have nothing but admiration and respect for the people of Mexico. But the hard truth is that, like any country, there is corruption; A virus that is taking away valuable members of society. This “femicide” needs to stop. The women of Juarez deserve their dignity back, their protection back and the life God gave them.
The women kidnapped are presumed to be pressured to partake in sex trafficking then dumped. The mere fact that these women are low income and probably couldn’t afford a ransom doesn’t help their situation either. The government is allowing the impoverished to be taken advantage of. If the “strong” cannot even protect the “weak,” then surely the country cannot progress as a nation.
The truth is, the Mexican government needs to make a harder effort to protect their young female citizens and gain justice for the families of victims.
The victims tend to be slender with dark hair and dark eyes. The similar physical appearance among the missing girls is a clue. Anyone can see that a certain group is being targeted.
When will enough be enough for the police to wake up and recognize the gravity of this issue? In Mexico, as in any other country, there are drug problems and human trafficking, so if the government is trying to gain a better image for their country, it’s interesting to observe that they aren’t making a more valiant effort to try and find these women. To say that there are just too many missing to try and find them all is no valid reason. Neither is playing the blame game.
The Mexican Government blames the victims. They claim the young women are simply running away from home with their boyfriends. But I doubt the families of the 900 women that were captured, tortured and killed between 1993 and 2010 would have agreed with this reasoning.
Another theory police have is that there is a rapist on the lurk kidnapping women and killing them. Well I’m sure there are several, but for one man to kidnap 900 hundred is just too naïve of an idea.
According to the Juarez Project, an advocacy organization aimed at helping the women of Juarez, about 90 percent of the women who go missing are employed by sweatshops, otherwise known as the maquiladora sector. These factories export products to the United States, which is to be assumed because Juarez borders the Texas city of El Paso.
I think it’s safe to say that something inhumane is lurking around the streets of Juarez, more than just rapists. Let’s look at the bigger picture. Hundreds of women, with similar physical characteristics are going missing (and many found dead) in a town filled with drug cartel and human trafficking. And the police have the audacity to tell everyone that they don’t know what could have happened to these girls. Not one clue? The best they can come up with is that these girls, with dreams, goals, educations, are running away with their boyfriends? Give me a break. Justice is not being served. Someone is preying on the weak. And the authorities are not telling on that someone.
These women going missing are no coincidences. Someone is making a profitable business on these girls and they do not like how the community is starting to react. Advocacy groups have begun to emerge. These organizations are comprised of mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, aunts, and people who care about their fellow sisters whose stories deserve to be told.
Susan Chavez was a leader in the advocacy movement to push Juarez authorities to find out what is happening to all these women. Chavez was found murdered outside an abandoned house three months ago. This was such a loss to the people of Juarez that the police tried to keep her murder covered up to keep from causing unrest within the Juarez community. I think it’s fair to reason that there has been unrest since these women have begun to disappear.
Had the women all going missing been a coincidence, then no one would have targeted Chavez, a prominent advocate for the missing women and their families since the early 1990s. Gupta wrote in his article that Chavez, “ came up with the slogan, ‘Ni una muerte mas,” or, “Not one more death.” They wanted her silenced. She was an obstacle to them, another voice that had the potential to shed light on a “business” no one would speak about. There is no for sure answer as to what this “business” is, but whatever it is, it involves the lives of innocent women.
It’s hard to address a problem if its root cannot be located. Although authorities have very obvious leads to work with (i.e. drug cartels, human trafficking rings, etc…). Maybe they’re scared? Maybe they know, but fear for their lives? But what people do know is that the people of Juarez need to stand up for their protection and for the lives of their women. Maybe, just maybe, they can push the government to really do something for the innocent women who deserved to live. There can still be hope. There can still be prevention. Lessons can be learned, and in turn lives can be saved. Good always overcomes evil. The women of Juarez are forced to be slaves of fear, but now only the truth can set them free.
Hundred of “Missing Women” flyers line the walls of Juarez buildings. They show the pictures and description of girls, ages fifteen to their early twenties.; Attempts of families trying to find answers.
One cannot help but wonder, where is the government in this mess? The corruption of the countries police force is quite evident, but still no justified excuse as to why so many innocent lives with so much potential are taken away, especially with no closure given to their families.
According to a report done by reporter Girish Gupta of New Statesman, since current Mexican president, Felipe Calderon took office in 2006 the number of women vanishing or being killed has risen. If the country’s president cannot come to the assistance of these young women, then surely this gives a reflection of the political state of the country.
Now, before I elaborate on this issue I would like to add a note about Mexico. It truly is a wonderful country with beautiful people, nature and culture. And this piece is in no way trying to tarnish the reputation of this country with rich history. I have nothing but admiration and respect for the people of Mexico. But the hard truth is that, like any country, there is corruption; A virus that is taking away valuable members of society. This “femicide” needs to stop. The women of Juarez deserve their dignity back, their protection back and the life God gave them.
The women kidnapped are presumed to be pressured to partake in sex trafficking then dumped. The mere fact that these women are low income and probably couldn’t afford a ransom doesn’t help their situation either. The government is allowing the impoverished to be taken advantage of. If the “strong” cannot even protect the “weak,” then surely the country cannot progress as a nation.
The truth is, the Mexican government needs to make a harder effort to protect their young female citizens and gain justice for the families of victims.
The victims tend to be slender with dark hair and dark eyes. The similar physical appearance among the missing girls is a clue. Anyone can see that a certain group is being targeted.
When will enough be enough for the police to wake up and recognize the gravity of this issue? In Mexico, as in any other country, there are drug problems and human trafficking, so if the government is trying to gain a better image for their country, it’s interesting to observe that they aren’t making a more valiant effort to try and find these women. To say that there are just too many missing to try and find them all is no valid reason. Neither is playing the blame game.
The Mexican Government blames the victims. They claim the young women are simply running away from home with their boyfriends. But I doubt the families of the 900 women that were captured, tortured and killed between 1993 and 2010 would have agreed with this reasoning.
Another theory police have is that there is a rapist on the lurk kidnapping women and killing them. Well I’m sure there are several, but for one man to kidnap 900 hundred is just too naïve of an idea.
According to the Juarez Project, an advocacy organization aimed at helping the women of Juarez, about 90 percent of the women who go missing are employed by sweatshops, otherwise known as the maquiladora sector. These factories export products to the United States, which is to be assumed because Juarez borders the Texas city of El Paso.
I think it’s safe to say that something inhumane is lurking around the streets of Juarez, more than just rapists. Let’s look at the bigger picture. Hundreds of women, with similar physical characteristics are going missing (and many found dead) in a town filled with drug cartel and human trafficking. And the police have the audacity to tell everyone that they don’t know what could have happened to these girls. Not one clue? The best they can come up with is that these girls, with dreams, goals, educations, are running away with their boyfriends? Give me a break. Justice is not being served. Someone is preying on the weak. And the authorities are not telling on that someone.
These women going missing are no coincidences. Someone is making a profitable business on these girls and they do not like how the community is starting to react. Advocacy groups have begun to emerge. These organizations are comprised of mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, aunts, and people who care about their fellow sisters whose stories deserve to be told.
Susan Chavez was a leader in the advocacy movement to push Juarez authorities to find out what is happening to all these women. Chavez was found murdered outside an abandoned house three months ago. This was such a loss to the people of Juarez that the police tried to keep her murder covered up to keep from causing unrest within the Juarez community. I think it’s fair to reason that there has been unrest since these women have begun to disappear.
Had the women all going missing been a coincidence, then no one would have targeted Chavez, a prominent advocate for the missing women and their families since the early 1990s. Gupta wrote in his article that Chavez, “ came up with the slogan, ‘Ni una muerte mas,” or, “Not one more death.” They wanted her silenced. She was an obstacle to them, another voice that had the potential to shed light on a “business” no one would speak about. There is no for sure answer as to what this “business” is, but whatever it is, it involves the lives of innocent women.
It’s hard to address a problem if its root cannot be located. Although authorities have very obvious leads to work with (i.e. drug cartels, human trafficking rings, etc…). Maybe they’re scared? Maybe they know, but fear for their lives? But what people do know is that the people of Juarez need to stand up for their protection and for the lives of their women. Maybe, just maybe, they can push the government to really do something for the innocent women who deserved to live. There can still be hope. There can still be prevention. Lessons can be learned, and in turn lives can be saved. Good always overcomes evil. The women of Juarez are forced to be slaves of fear, but now only the truth can set them free.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
A moment of silence for the children unheard
There is a national epidemic that has been hitting our nation for years. Children are dying; more than 1, 700 a year. These deaths could have been prevented, just ask their social workers at the child protection agencies that were supposed to protect them.
Every year children in states across the U.S. are victims of abuse. To give you a clearer picture, Child Welfare reported that children younger than one year made up almost half of the percentage of children being abused.
Children from the ages of one to three made up 35 percent; ages four to seven, ten percent; Eight to eleven, four percent; and ages 12 to 17, six percent.
Children younger and younger are being targeted and left to die. Where is their protection?
Too many times you turn on the television and you see commercials about abused puppies, asking for people to give money to humane societies or to adopt them, to give them a better home, where they will be loved and properly cared for.
What about the children?
What about four year-old Marchella Pierce from New York, who was physically abused and tied to her bed by her mother? She was only eighteen pounds when she died last September.
Didn’t little Marchella deserve a better home? A home where she would be loved and respected as a human being, more importantly, as a child of God.
Marchella’s mom, who is said to have been addicted to drugs, is already facing murder charges. According to a report by New York Times reporter, Mosi Secret, prosecutors said her mother, “tied her to her bed, beat her with a belt and a videocassette tape, deprived her of food and water, and force-fed her medication. Marchella died… of child abuse syndrome, along with acute drug poisoning, blunt impact injuries, malnutrition and dehydration.”
Couldn’t Marchella’s social worker see the red flags? What about the New York judicial system? Why was she even allowed to live with her mother given the evidence of abuse and drug use?
Now Marchella’s welfare worker and his supervisor are being indicted on charges of criminally negligent homicide, along with her grandmother who allegedly saw her being abused and tied to the bed, reported the New York Times.
The sad truth is that Marchella’s story is just the tip of the ice berg. Many other children have lost their lives to the negligence of the child protection system. Now this is not to say that all the social workers are being negligent, but too many are.
In 2006, seven-year-old Nixzmary Brown, who was also under the protection of the child welfare agency, died due to child abuse. New York Times reporter Mosi Secret and Cara Buckley reported that she had been “tied to furniture with bungee cords and ropes and was beaten by her step-father.” Although despite her situation the Child Welfare Agency did nothing.
The problem could be traced to that fact that too many cases are being assigned to each social worker, it may be hard to keep tabs on every child- but that is still no excuse. And what’s worse, the state of New York is now looking to cut funds for child welfare agencies. With positions being cut, now there is a lower amount workers assigned to follow more cases of children being abused.
According to the New York Times, the average case worker is assigned to 16.5 cases, but since the many reports of neglect on behalf of these workers have emerged over the past few years, the load is now being narrowed down to nine cases.
The words, “case closed,” should only be used when workers are for certain that the child is in safe hands. Higher standards need to be established by these agencies to better assure that abused children will not be left to abusive parents.
Our children need protection. Negligence is not a valid response to the overwhelming amount of children that need shelter from their dysfunctional homes.
I’m not here to judge Marchella’s case worker, but one can only hope that this will be an example to all social workers everywhere. Hopefully it can serve as a message, telling everyone that a child’s life is not to be gambled with. One can never be too careful, especially when in the position to protect the life of an innocent person being abused.
Like the old saying goes. To whom much is given, much is expected. The life of any child is precious; the case workers must recognize this and realize that they have the ability to make a positive difference in the world and for these kids. Why not start on the right path and make sure these children do not become another statistic.
Every year children in states across the U.S. are victims of abuse. To give you a clearer picture, Child Welfare reported that children younger than one year made up almost half of the percentage of children being abused.
Children from the ages of one to three made up 35 percent; ages four to seven, ten percent; Eight to eleven, four percent; and ages 12 to 17, six percent.
Children younger and younger are being targeted and left to die. Where is their protection?
Too many times you turn on the television and you see commercials about abused puppies, asking for people to give money to humane societies or to adopt them, to give them a better home, where they will be loved and properly cared for.
What about the children?
What about four year-old Marchella Pierce from New York, who was physically abused and tied to her bed by her mother? She was only eighteen pounds when she died last September.
Didn’t little Marchella deserve a better home? A home where she would be loved and respected as a human being, more importantly, as a child of God.
Marchella’s mom, who is said to have been addicted to drugs, is already facing murder charges. According to a report by New York Times reporter, Mosi Secret, prosecutors said her mother, “tied her to her bed, beat her with a belt and a videocassette tape, deprived her of food and water, and force-fed her medication. Marchella died… of child abuse syndrome, along with acute drug poisoning, blunt impact injuries, malnutrition and dehydration.”
Couldn’t Marchella’s social worker see the red flags? What about the New York judicial system? Why was she even allowed to live with her mother given the evidence of abuse and drug use?
Now Marchella’s welfare worker and his supervisor are being indicted on charges of criminally negligent homicide, along with her grandmother who allegedly saw her being abused and tied to the bed, reported the New York Times.
The sad truth is that Marchella’s story is just the tip of the ice berg. Many other children have lost their lives to the negligence of the child protection system. Now this is not to say that all the social workers are being negligent, but too many are.
In 2006, seven-year-old Nixzmary Brown, who was also under the protection of the child welfare agency, died due to child abuse. New York Times reporter Mosi Secret and Cara Buckley reported that she had been “tied to furniture with bungee cords and ropes and was beaten by her step-father.” Although despite her situation the Child Welfare Agency did nothing.
The problem could be traced to that fact that too many cases are being assigned to each social worker, it may be hard to keep tabs on every child- but that is still no excuse. And what’s worse, the state of New York is now looking to cut funds for child welfare agencies. With positions being cut, now there is a lower amount workers assigned to follow more cases of children being abused.
According to the New York Times, the average case worker is assigned to 16.5 cases, but since the many reports of neglect on behalf of these workers have emerged over the past few years, the load is now being narrowed down to nine cases.
The words, “case closed,” should only be used when workers are for certain that the child is in safe hands. Higher standards need to be established by these agencies to better assure that abused children will not be left to abusive parents.
Our children need protection. Negligence is not a valid response to the overwhelming amount of children that need shelter from their dysfunctional homes.
I’m not here to judge Marchella’s case worker, but one can only hope that this will be an example to all social workers everywhere. Hopefully it can serve as a message, telling everyone that a child’s life is not to be gambled with. One can never be too careful, especially when in the position to protect the life of an innocent person being abused.
Like the old saying goes. To whom much is given, much is expected. The life of any child is precious; the case workers must recognize this and realize that they have the ability to make a positive difference in the world and for these kids. Why not start on the right path and make sure these children do not become another statistic.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Backbone of our nation
Undocumented immigrants give a new meaning to the United State’s slogan, “home of the free.” I mean after all they come here and basically work for nothing.
Next time you bite into a nice juicy strawberry, use a clean bathroom, admire your mowed lawn, think of the immigrant who did that for you.
The next young Spanish-speaking bus boy, that cleans your five-star restaurant table, the cleaning woman that’s scrubbing your toilet, the woman than sewed your favorite shirt, imagine a world without them.
Illegal immigrants make up about five percent of the country’s labor force. Alan Greenspan, former Federal Reserve Chairman even agrees that undocumented workers are important to our economy saying, “Undocumented workers accounted for a sixth of the growth in the nation’s workforce over the first eight years of the decade. Even after the flow of illegal workers has slowed with the recession,” reported Michael Mcauliff of New York Daily News Writer.
Some politicians want a world without them, so this may be a reality coming to a city near you.
These are my modern-day heroes. But to those in the “political world,” they are an economic detriment, taking jobs away from the millions of unemployed in this country.
But that’s funny? The last time I was on Craig’s list or any other job site, I didn’t see any job postings for any field worker willing to work below minimum wage with no benefits. I have not met one American Citizen that would be willing to work sunrise to sunset picking your lettuce or scrubbing the toilet of the rich and famous.
If only the Texas lawmakers would know the lives of these immigrants. If you haven’t already heard, the state of Texas is proposing the House Bill 1202, which would make citizens spend up to two years in prison and pay up to $10,000 in fines if caught hiring illegal immigrants for any type of work.
Associated Press Economics writer, Jeannine Aversa put it so nicely, “If all the illegal workers in this country were booted out tomorrow, economists believe wages would have to rise significantly to get U.S.-born workers to take their jobs.”
According to a poll conducted by AP-lpsos, “about two-thirds of Americans surveyed, said they believed illegal immigrants did the jobs most Americans don’t want,” reported the AP.
Some illegal immigrants pay taxes too. “The Social Security Administration estimates that about three quarters of illegal workers pay taxes that contribute to the overall solvency of Social Security and Medicare,” reported the AP.
To further support my argument the AP also reported that William Ford, an Economist from Middle Tennessee State University, said, “a majority of economists agree that illegal immigrants are a net benefit for the U.S. economy. He said the tax contributions from illegal immigrants, including sales taxes, property taxes and exercise taxes 9such as gas tax) are significant,” reported the AP, via MSNBC.
Lawmakers are targeting the Latino immigrant, because the last time I checked Homeland Security wasn’t going out to deport illegal Canadians or pulling them over suspecting that they may be illegal. But that’s another story, for another op-ed piece.
A lot of people don’t know that many of these immigrants that provide inexpensive labor for this country are actually professionals back home. Many of them leave their lives as a dentist, doctor, real estate agent and come here to flee the dangers and struggling economy of their home towns. Much to the surprise of many, not all who cross the border are smuggling drugs.
They risk their lives to come here and make whatever they can to send back money to their families. At the same time they are the only ones willing to work for such low pay at such great quality. These people are hard workers, willing to put their professional pride aside and help the American people do jobs that, well lets face it, that not even people that are unemployed will do.
Not only is this Texas bill going to actually hurt the economy, but is unfair for the Americans who are struggling financially or even the Americans who don’t even know they are hiring illegal immigrants.
Again in the wise words of Aversa,“They pay payroll taxes, they’re helping bankroll Social Security and Medicare but won’t get to participate in the programs because of their immigrant status. Experts also note that illegal immigrants also spend part of their paychecks in this country- for food, clothes, furniture, living expenses and other things- all of which contribute to economic growth.”
Are we really going to prosecute people for hiring someone to mow their lawn or clean their laundry room? People who although, do not have a “legal” status, are willing to work hard in this country for basically nothing.
As far as I’m concerned, the immigrants in this country are the backbone for our nation.
I understand that we have rules in the United States against illegal aliens for purposes of homeland security. And I respect these laws.
But I still can’t help but wonder why are we to prosecute Americans who can’t afford more expensive labor, and persecute those we are willing to contribute to our country through hard labor?
It doesn’t make sense.
So put the people who hire illegal immigrants in jail. And send the immigrants back home. What will this do?
Well for starters, lets see this large deficit we are facing as a country. Well, it will go up because we are putting more undeserving people in jail, thus spending more money through are prison-system and take up spots and money from people who actually committed crimes that are “jail-worthy.”
And well as far as our produce and clean bathrooms, well those probably will be sparse too, because I think it can be assumed that American citizens will not dare to work the same hours with out benefits as these immigrants do.
I believe Texas lawmakers need to think hard about this. They are shooting their state in the foot. They are aware that their state in particular thrives because of the hard work of the illegal immigrant that has crossed the border.
Now I am not trying to promote people to break the law and violate federal law, through “knowingly” hiring illegal immigrants. All I’m asking is for lawmakers to stop covering their eyes from something everyone already knows. Let’s take a look at the big pink elephant in the room. And that is the fact that the illegal immigrants of this country deserve to work here. They work hard for this country, harder than most Americans I know.
I encourage Texas politicians and those in all states to recognize the unjust nature of the House Bill 1202. Not only will it entrap American citizens who don’t know, but cause a decrease of our modern day heroes. These are the man who pours your coffee and the woman who leaves her children and takes care of your baby, these so called, “illegal aliens.”
But they are my heroes.
Next time you bite into a nice juicy strawberry, use a clean bathroom, admire your mowed lawn, think of the immigrant who did that for you.
The next young Spanish-speaking bus boy, that cleans your five-star restaurant table, the cleaning woman that’s scrubbing your toilet, the woman than sewed your favorite shirt, imagine a world without them.
Illegal immigrants make up about five percent of the country’s labor force. Alan Greenspan, former Federal Reserve Chairman even agrees that undocumented workers are important to our economy saying, “Undocumented workers accounted for a sixth of the growth in the nation’s workforce over the first eight years of the decade. Even after the flow of illegal workers has slowed with the recession,” reported Michael Mcauliff of New York Daily News Writer.
Some politicians want a world without them, so this may be a reality coming to a city near you.
These are my modern-day heroes. But to those in the “political world,” they are an economic detriment, taking jobs away from the millions of unemployed in this country.
But that’s funny? The last time I was on Craig’s list or any other job site, I didn’t see any job postings for any field worker willing to work below minimum wage with no benefits. I have not met one American Citizen that would be willing to work sunrise to sunset picking your lettuce or scrubbing the toilet of the rich and famous.
If only the Texas lawmakers would know the lives of these immigrants. If you haven’t already heard, the state of Texas is proposing the House Bill 1202, which would make citizens spend up to two years in prison and pay up to $10,000 in fines if caught hiring illegal immigrants for any type of work.
Associated Press Economics writer, Jeannine Aversa put it so nicely, “If all the illegal workers in this country were booted out tomorrow, economists believe wages would have to rise significantly to get U.S.-born workers to take their jobs.”
According to a poll conducted by AP-lpsos, “about two-thirds of Americans surveyed, said they believed illegal immigrants did the jobs most Americans don’t want,” reported the AP.
Some illegal immigrants pay taxes too. “The Social Security Administration estimates that about three quarters of illegal workers pay taxes that contribute to the overall solvency of Social Security and Medicare,” reported the AP.
To further support my argument the AP also reported that William Ford, an Economist from Middle Tennessee State University, said, “a majority of economists agree that illegal immigrants are a net benefit for the U.S. economy. He said the tax contributions from illegal immigrants, including sales taxes, property taxes and exercise taxes 9such as gas tax) are significant,” reported the AP, via MSNBC.
Lawmakers are targeting the Latino immigrant, because the last time I checked Homeland Security wasn’t going out to deport illegal Canadians or pulling them over suspecting that they may be illegal. But that’s another story, for another op-ed piece.
A lot of people don’t know that many of these immigrants that provide inexpensive labor for this country are actually professionals back home. Many of them leave their lives as a dentist, doctor, real estate agent and come here to flee the dangers and struggling economy of their home towns. Much to the surprise of many, not all who cross the border are smuggling drugs.
They risk their lives to come here and make whatever they can to send back money to their families. At the same time they are the only ones willing to work for such low pay at such great quality. These people are hard workers, willing to put their professional pride aside and help the American people do jobs that, well lets face it, that not even people that are unemployed will do.
Not only is this Texas bill going to actually hurt the economy, but is unfair for the Americans who are struggling financially or even the Americans who don’t even know they are hiring illegal immigrants.
Again in the wise words of Aversa,“They pay payroll taxes, they’re helping bankroll Social Security and Medicare but won’t get to participate in the programs because of their immigrant status. Experts also note that illegal immigrants also spend part of their paychecks in this country- for food, clothes, furniture, living expenses and other things- all of which contribute to economic growth.”
Are we really going to prosecute people for hiring someone to mow their lawn or clean their laundry room? People who although, do not have a “legal” status, are willing to work hard in this country for basically nothing.
As far as I’m concerned, the immigrants in this country are the backbone for our nation.
I understand that we have rules in the United States against illegal aliens for purposes of homeland security. And I respect these laws.
But I still can’t help but wonder why are we to prosecute Americans who can’t afford more expensive labor, and persecute those we are willing to contribute to our country through hard labor?
It doesn’t make sense.
So put the people who hire illegal immigrants in jail. And send the immigrants back home. What will this do?
Well for starters, lets see this large deficit we are facing as a country. Well, it will go up because we are putting more undeserving people in jail, thus spending more money through are prison-system and take up spots and money from people who actually committed crimes that are “jail-worthy.”
And well as far as our produce and clean bathrooms, well those probably will be sparse too, because I think it can be assumed that American citizens will not dare to work the same hours with out benefits as these immigrants do.
I believe Texas lawmakers need to think hard about this. They are shooting their state in the foot. They are aware that their state in particular thrives because of the hard work of the illegal immigrant that has crossed the border.
Now I am not trying to promote people to break the law and violate federal law, through “knowingly” hiring illegal immigrants. All I’m asking is for lawmakers to stop covering their eyes from something everyone already knows. Let’s take a look at the big pink elephant in the room. And that is the fact that the illegal immigrants of this country deserve to work here. They work hard for this country, harder than most Americans I know.
I encourage Texas politicians and those in all states to recognize the unjust nature of the House Bill 1202. Not only will it entrap American citizens who don’t know, but cause a decrease of our modern day heroes. These are the man who pours your coffee and the woman who leaves her children and takes care of your baby, these so called, “illegal aliens.”
But they are my heroes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)